Clean Power, Dirty Boots: Top 5 Learnings From the Business of Nuclear Summit
From Theory to Practice: Bringing Nuclear Energy into the Real World
Despite decades of promise, rebuilding America’s nuclear energy backbone in the U.S. has remained mostly theoretical: admired on whiteboards, stalled in real-world execution. This year’s Business of Nuclear Summit — hosted by Alumni Ventures, 8VC, Founders Fund, and Idaho National Laboratory — gathered policymakers, builders, utilities, investors, and federal labs to explore one big question:
What will it take to turn promising nuclear technologies into grid-connected, revenue-generating assets—on timelines that matter?
Here’s what we learned from those in the trenches.
1. BE HONEST ABOUT READINESS
The “downfall” of projects like Vogtle wasn’t just technical, it was cultural. Teams overpromised and underdelivered. Designs weren’t mature. Schedules weren’t real. And the market lost trust. In a sector where the bar is perfection, credibility is currency.
Builders need to get serious about design maturity before the first dollar is raised or the first pour of concrete. In other infrastructure-heavy sectors — like aerospace or defense — first builds happen at smaller scale, with iteration, quality control, and design loops baked in.
We should apply the same rigor in nuclear.
Takeaway: Break large projects into manageable, verifiable phases. Build engineering muscle at each step. Don’t sell a future you haven’t built yet.
2. YES, WE CAN BUILD FAST
It’s a myth that nuclear construction has to take a decade. Execution speed exists; it’s just trapped in silos.
- Consider this: Utilities like Constellation have replaced steam generators at operating nuclear plants — essentially nuclear open-heart surgery — in under 30 days. Why can’t we bring that same urgency and operational excellence to new builds?
- The answer: We haven’t aligned incentives around speed. Utilities still get paid for CAPEX. Regulators still default to risk aversion.
But new nuclear doesn’t have the luxury of time. Data centers, industrials, and state decarbonization mandates are asking for reliable, carbon-free power now.
Takeaway: Speed isn’t foreign, it’s just underutilized. Treat nuclear construction like a mission-critical delivery, not a science fair project. Lock in timelines and hire experienced EPCs. Let urgency drive execution.
3. FIRST-OF-A-KIND FINANCING NEEDS A BRIDGE
Everyone wants to see new nuclear get built, but no one wants to be first.
FOAK (first-of-a-kind) projects face a brutal finance gap. They’re too risky for pure private equity, too slow for most venture investors, and too new for traditional project finance. The only way through is with a capital stack that blends tax credits (e.g., 45U, 48E), anchor offtake agreements, federal support, and skin-in-the-game from customers.
But it’s not just about money; it’s about confidence. “Spare me the TED Talk. Bring me a term sheet.” Buyers want schedule certainty, tested technology, and operational readiness.
Takeaway: Successful projects will go beyond raising capital — they’ll choreograph it. Bring DOE guarantees, customer commitments, EPCs, and permitting pathways to the table early. Capital moves when risks are known and shared.
4. IT’S ABOUT SYSTEMS, NOT JUST SCIENCE
The Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is not religion. Some customers don’t just want energy but assets, reliability, or specific capabilities.
Shine Technologies (an Alumni Ventures portfolio company) is a perfect example. They’re using neutrons to create high-value medical isotopes in a business model built around value conversion, not kilowatt-hours.
For other buyers — like hyperscalers — speed, resilience, and uptime matter more than the marginal price per MWh. Microsoft is reportedly paying 12 cents/kWh for firm, 24/7 nuclear power from Constellation. Why? Because delay costs more than price.
Some developers are flipping the model. Instead of selling electrons, they are selling a modular energy system or micro-reactor unit with optionality.
Takeaway: Know your buyer. Beyond clean energy, pitch uptime, independence, and strategic value. Flexible business models unlock new buyers.
5. WHAT BUYERS ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT
If you want to sell nuclear, skip the buzzwords. Buyers — especially utilities and data center operators — care about the following:
- LCOE realism: What is the true cost of delivered power over 40 years — including O&M, refueling, waste, and decommissioning?
- Schedule certainty: Commercial Operation Date (COD) must be fixed, credible, and enforceable. Delays kill deals.
- Capital stack clarity: Where’s the equity? The debt? Is the DOE backing it? Are tax credits structured in?
- Permitting and siting: What’s your plan to get through local, state, and NRC approval? Is the community onboard?
- Operational model: Who’s owning and running this for the next 50 years? Do they have experience?
- Risk-sharing: What if you’re late? What if the tech underperforms? Contracts need contingencies.
If you can answer these questions with confidence, you’re in business. If you can’t, you’re not ready.
Takeaway: The buyer is your customer but also your partner. Treat them like investors. Build trust with clear answers and shared incentives.
FINAL WORD
This isn’t a science experiment anymore. It’s a procurement process.
Nuclear must earn its place in the real world, going beyond elegant physics to operational discipline, contracting acumen, and an unshakable bias toward execution.
We don’t need more whitepapers. We need reactors online.
Less vision, more builders. Let’s get to work.
Learn More About the U.S. Strategic Tech Fund
We are seeing strong interest in our U.S. Strategic Tech Fund. If you’d like to join us, we recommend securing a spot promptly.
Invest in technologies vital to U.S. national interests in a portfolio of ~15-20 venture investments made over ~12-18 months — diversified by stage, sector, geography, lead investor.
Max Accredited Investor Limit: 249
This communication is from Alumni Ventures, a for-profit venture capital company that is not affiliated with or endorsed by any school. It is not personalized advice, and AV only provides advice to its client funds. This communication is neither an offer to sell, nor a solicitation of an offer to purchase, any security. Such offers are made only pursuant to the formal offering documents for the fund(s) concerned, and describe significant risks and other material information that should be carefully considered before investing. For additional information, please see here. Example portfolio companies are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of any AV fund or the outcomes experienced by any investor. Example portfolio companies shown are not available to future investors, except potentially in the case of follow-on investments. Venture capital investing involves substantial risk, including risk of loss of all capital invested. This communication includes forward-looking statements, generally consisting of any statement pertaining to any issue other than historical fact, including without limitation predictions, financial projections, the anticipated results of the execution of any plan or strategy, the expectation or belief of the speaker, or other events or circumstances to exist in the future. Forward-looking statements are not representations of actual fact, depend on certain assumptions that may not be realized, and are not guaranteed to occur. Any forward-looking statements included in this communication speak only as of the date of the communication. AV and its affiliates disclaim any obligation to update, amend, or alter such forward-looking statements, whether due to subsequent events, new information, or otherwise.